<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Performance Manager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com</link>
	<description>Best Practices in Performance Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Actions &amp; Outcomes in Sales &amp; Service</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/801</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/801#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting right to the point: the desired goal and outcome of sales, customer service and relationship management initiatives is improved profit. 
Profit growth results from retaining valuable customers and cost-optimizing customer service.  Valued customers are acquired by the Sales process and enhanced and retained in the ongoing Service process.
Until now, these outcomes could only be measured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting right to the point: the desired goal and outcome of sales, customer service and relationship management initiatives is <strong>improved profit</strong>. </p>
<p>Profit growth results from retaining valuable customers and cost-optimizing customer service.  Valued customers are acquired by the Sales process and enhanced and retained in the ongoing Service process.</p>
<p>Until now, these outcomes could only be measured after the fact, after the actions, often too late in the workflow to improve behaviors and performance.</p>
<p>But, that is finally changing&#8230;   <a title="Actions &amp; Outcomes in Sales &amp; Service" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/process/process-commentaries/actionsoutcomesinsalesservice" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/801/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting &amp; Keeping Workforce Engagement</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/783</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/783#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Lest we forget, it’s your workforce that actually does the work to execute strategies to fulfill your goals and objectives. And, if your workforce isn’t “bought in”, or engaged, in your goals, objectives, strategies, and action plans, those simply won’t be achieved.
Getting, and keeping, workforce engagement is critical to success. It depends on the performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- Post Body Copy --></p>
<div>
<p>Lest we forget, it’s your workforce that actually does the work to execute strategies to fulfill your goals and objectives. And, if your workforce isn’t “bought in”, or engaged, in your goals, objectives, strategies, and action plans, those simply won’t be achieved.</p>
<p>Getting, and keeping, workforce engagement is critical to success. It depends on the performance management equivalent of financial “materiality”: Relevance. For your goals and strategies to be successfully accomplished, they need to be aligned, relevant, and meaningful to the nature of the workforce, and their&#8230;   <a title="Getting &amp; Keeping Workforce Engagement" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/people/people-commentaries/getting-keeping-workforce-engagement" target="_self">Read more</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/783/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automating Sales Operations: Why &amp; How</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/755</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/755#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 05:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These days, few if any organizations are still manually managing their sales processes. 
That being said, let’s state the obvious: using Excel to do anything is computer-enabled manual processing, but it is not automation.  Nor is using fragmented and dis-integrated tools for all of the elements related to sales and selling.  Just as the chain is only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, few if any organizations are still manually managing their sales processes. </p>
<p>That being said, let’s state the obvious: using Excel to do anything <em>is</em> computer-enabled manual processing, but it is <em>not</em> automation.  Nor is using fragmented and dis-integrated tools for all of the elements related to sales and selling.  Just as the chain is only as strong as its weakest link, automated Sales Operations management is only as useful and effective as its weakest element.</p>
<p>The goal of selling is to generate more revenue and profits by acquiring, retaining and enhancing profitable customer relationships.  The goal of Sales Operations is to&#8230;  <a title="Automating Sales Operations" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/technology/technology-commentaries/automating-sales-operations-why-how" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/755/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategic Convergence:</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/721</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/721#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workforce, Customer &#38; Channel Performance Management
What goes around, comes around. Once again, in an evolving post-downturn business climate, different relationship and performance expectations begin to re-emerge: &#8220;new&#8221; to some, &#8220;back to the future&#8221; for others.
Across every sector, the one-dimensional focus on workforce Sales Performance Management (SPM) is again beginning to reveal&#8230;  Read more
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Workforce, Customer &amp; Channel Performance Management</strong></p>
<p>What goes around, comes around. Once again, in an evolving post-downturn business climate, different relationship and performance expectations begin to re-emerge: &#8220;new&#8221; to some, &#8220;back to the future&#8221; for others.</p>
<p>Across every sector, the one-dimensional focus on workforce Sales Performance Management (SPM) is again beginning to reveal&#8230;  <a title="Strategic Convergence:" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/priorities/priority-commentaries/strategic-convergence" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/721/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Gets Measured Gets Done</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/120</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/120#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incentive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Performance Management will not work without effective feedback, reporting and information.
Once people have goals and targets, to keep them quickly adaptable to Plan changes and evolution over time, and to clearly communicate actual performance results, you need a comprehensive automated performance measurement system.
The Truth that &#8220;What Gets Measured Gets Done&#8221; is evident because measurement systems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Performance Management will not work without effective feedback, reporting and information.</p>
<p>Once people have goals and targets, to keep them quickly adaptable to Plan changes and evolution over time, and to clearly communicate actual performance results, you need a comprehensive automated performance measurement system.</p>
<p>The Truth that <em>&#8220;What Gets Measured Gets Done&#8221;</em> is evident because measurement systems are explicit and overt statements from the enterprise to its workforce on how Success is happening, or not.   <a title="The Measurement Rule" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/?page_id=84" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/120/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performance Management is a Verb</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/415</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/415#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What IS Performance Management?
It is not a software program or SaaS application that stores workforce performance appraisal results, competencies, and work histories.
It is not Business Intelligence, Analytics or Data Administration software or processes. 
It is also not administration, record-keeping, file management, or accounting about results.
We all tend to understand what we mean by “performance”, the work of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What IS Performance Management?</p>
<p>It is not<strong> </strong>a software program or SaaS application that stores workforce performance appraisal results, competencies, and work histories.</p>
<p>It is not<strong> </strong>Business Intelligence, Analytics or Data Administration software or processes. </p>
<p>It is also not administration, record-keeping, file management, or accounting about results.</p>
<p>We all tend to understand what we mean by “performance”, the work of getting something done.  The problem seems to be that some in the strategy, consulting, and software realms have inaccurately defined what “management” means.  <a title="Performance Management is a Verb" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/?page_id=400" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/415/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Coming Retention Crisis</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/676</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/676#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When economies downturn, the on-the-ground reality is that wealth-producing commercial enterprises (and, eventually also their dependent service-providers and governments) are forced to cut-back resource deployments: reduce their workforce, reduce investments, and reduce expenses.
Sustained economic downturns cut deeper into workforce reductions, into the realm of top-performers that missed cutbacks in earlier rounds. These downturns also reduce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When economies downturn, the on-the-ground reality is that wealth-producing commercial enterprises (and, eventually also their dependent service-providers and governments) are forced to cut-back resource deployments: reduce their workforce, reduce investments, and reduce expenses.</p>
<p>Sustained economic downturns cut deeper into workforce reductions, into the realm of top-performers that missed cutbacks in earlier rounds. These downturns also reduce competitors, and reduce customer service levels of the surviving enterprises.</p>
<p>This chain of events sets up more on-the-ground bad news for unprepared enterprises when&#8230;   <a title="The Coming Retention Crisis" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/people/people-commentaries/the-coming-retention-crisis" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/676/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategy vs. Execution: What’s More Important?</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/709</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/709#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strategy Formulation vs. Strategy Execution is like architecture and construction:  equally essential, and wholly interdependent.  One cannot fulfill without the other.
Without good blueprints, the house you build will be ugly and sub-functional, maybe dangerous (sounds like too many enterprises we all know, right?).  With good blueprints but bad construction, the house you build may be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strategy Formulation vs. Strategy Execution is like architecture and construction:  equally essential, and wholly interdependent.  One cannot fulfill without the other.</p>
<p>Without good blueprints, the house you build will be ugly and sub-functional, maybe dangerous (sounds like too many enterprises we all know, right?).  With good blueprints but bad construction, the house you build may be nice looking, but certainly sub-functional and definitely dangerous. </p>
<p>Practically speaking, while both Strategy Formulation and Execution have their challenges and difficulties, we&#8217;ve seen&#8230;   <a title="Strategy vs. Execution" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/process/process-commentaries/strategy-vs-execution" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/709/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performance Management’s Prime Directive</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/608</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/608#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty-five years and a few thousand client performance management projects have let us observe the evolution of organization strategy development and execution across multiple business cycles. This has provided us with a unique perspective on &#8220;what works and what doesn&#8217;t&#8221; in the realm of strategic and tactical planning, execution and performance management.
From that vantage point, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-five years and a few thousand client performance management projects have let us observe the evolution of organization strategy development and execution across multiple business cycles. This has provided us with a unique perspective on &#8220;what works and what doesn&#8217;t&#8221; in the realm of strategic and tactical planning, execution and performance management.</p>
<p>From that vantage point, we discovered a fundamental standard that has since unfailingly defined, and predicted, the extent to which human organizations succeed. It was, is, a profoundly powerful concept. We didn’t invent or innovate it, we observed and realized it during a client engagement in the early 1980&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Since then, we&#8217;ve seen similar organizations, implementing the same strategies, using the same processes, vendors and technologies, in exactly the same markets—each remarkably parallel enterprises in virtually all internal and external aspects—achieving diametrically opposite levels of success: one a market-crushing juggernaut, the other a market-crushed disaster. Why?   <a title="The Prime Directive" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/priorities/priority-rules/rule-1" target="_self">Read more </a></p>
<p class="MsoHeader" style="margin: 0in -0.05in 0pt 0in; tab-stops: .5in;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/608/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generally Accepted Performance Management Principles?</title>
		<link>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/276</link>
		<comments>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/276#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancemanagerblog.com/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that labor costs represent one of the most significant expense items for most enterprises, it should come as no surprise to anyone that “personnel”, “talent”, or “human resource” management is a major strategic and tactical priority.
Too many organizations, however, both in and outside of the commercial arena, take far too much for granted when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that labor costs represent one of the most significant expense items for most enterprises, it should come as no surprise to anyone that “personnel”, “talent”, or “human resource” management is a major strategic and tactical priority.</p>
<p>Too many organizations, however, both in and outside of the commercial arena, take far too much for granted when it comes to the management of workforce performance. The facts are that when it comes to the workforce, most organizations implement broad-based yet highly fragmented and ineffective initiatives, or invest the minimum required by regulation and law, or both.</p>
<p>Since there <strong>are</strong> no <strong>“Generally Accepted Performance Management Principles”</strong>, each enterprise is left to its own devices to imagine, construct, implement, sustain, and evolve its own ‘unique’ approach. They do so with the participation of stakeholders, subject matter specialists, consultants, technologists and governments who have not agreed on any standards.</p>
<p>Sadly, that’s the world within which most workforce members perceive they live and work.  The fundamental consequence is the under-performance of most human enterprises.</p>
<p>Employee/Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is an approach that applies the same process, procedure and technology rigor, consistency, and universality to workforce performance as organizations now apply to Financial Resource Management; at least within an organization.   <a title="Why Performance Matters" href="http://performancemanagerblog.com/?page_id=2" target="_self">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://performancemanagerblog.com/index.php/archives/276/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
